briefing_papers
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
briefing_papers [2019/07/09 15:56] 109.149.81.116 |
briefing_papers [2020/07/06 05:43] admin |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| <font 18px/inherit;;rgb(192, 57, 43);;inherit>**"I just want to say how perfect these are for our librarian audience. Perfect length, perfect tone, and perfect amount of technical info". **</font><font 18px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>**Jim Lynch, Techsoupglobal.org**</font> | <font 18px/inherit;;rgb(192, 57, 43);;inherit>**"I just want to say how perfect these are for our librarian audience. Perfect length, perfect tone, and perfect amount of technical info". **</font><font 18px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>**Jim Lynch, Techsoupglobal.org**</font> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Aggregate and amplify -enhancing the value and use of theses and dissertations ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | **[[https://www.kenchadconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Aggregate_and_amplify_enhancing_the-value_and_use_of_TDs_July2020.pdf|Aggregate and amplify -enhancing the value and use of theses and dissertations]].** Ken Chad. Higher Education Library Technology [HELibTech] Briefing Paper No. 6, July 2020 | ||
| + | |||
| + | Theses and dissertations (TDs) form a core part of the research outputs of an academic institution. However, they do not usually get the same attention as journal published research. Universities are doing more to make this category of research outputs more easily discoverable to a growing global community of scholars. In this way they increase visibility for the institution and individual by amplifying the reach to the wider scholarly community. The paper looks at the value to the author, the institution and the global research community. It analyses the particular value that TD specific aggregations offer in terms of enhancing discovery, text and data mining, making historical works more discoverable through digitisation and preservation. It addresses the contentious issue of embargoes and open access. The paper presents the case for an aggregated, amplified, global and digitised approach to TDs. | ||
| ==== The rise of library centric reading list systems ==== | ==== The rise of library centric reading list systems ==== | ||
| Line 38: | Line 44: | ||
| \\ | \\ | ||
| [[http://www.kenchadconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Rethinking_the_LSP_Jan2016a.pdf|Rethinking the Library Services Platform]]. By Ken Chad HELIbTech briefing paper No. 2. | [[http://www.kenchadconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Rethinking_the_LSP_Jan2016a.pdf|Rethinking the Library Services Platform]]. By Ken Chad HELIbTech briefing paper No. 2. | ||
| + | |||
| + | (Also available in German {{:rethinking_the_lsp_deutsch_trans_jan2017.pdf|Überdenken des Konzeptes “Library Services Platform“}} | ||
| The second in the series of HELibTech briefing papers challenges the current definition of a library services platform (LSP) and suggests ways in which library systems might develop. While a new generation of library systems has emerged there remains a very significant lack of interoperability between the various components that make up the wider library technology ‘ecosystem’. So, although we talk of library services platforms, libraries and library system vendors have not yet fully realised a platform-based, interoperable library ecosystem. Cloud computing could help break this paradigm as it is doing with enterprise resource planning (ERP) solutions. Gartner, an information technology market research and advisory firm, suggests that the ERP suite is being deconstructed into what they characterise as a ‘postmodern ERP.’ Gartner suggests that the result will be a more loosely coupled environment with much of the functionality sourced as Cloud services or via business process outsourcers. Will we see the same trend in library technology?\\ | The second in the series of HELibTech briefing papers challenges the current definition of a library services platform (LSP) and suggests ways in which library systems might develop. While a new generation of library systems has emerged there remains a very significant lack of interoperability between the various components that make up the wider library technology ‘ecosystem’. So, although we talk of library services platforms, libraries and library system vendors have not yet fully realised a platform-based, interoperable library ecosystem. Cloud computing could help break this paradigm as it is doing with enterprise resource planning (ERP) solutions. Gartner, an information technology market research and advisory firm, suggests that the ERP suite is being deconstructed into what they characterise as a ‘postmodern ERP.’ Gartner suggests that the result will be a more loosely coupled environment with much of the functionality sourced as Cloud services or via business process outsourcers. Will we see the same trend in library technology?\\ | ||
briefing_papers.txt · Last modified: 2024/03/06 05:33 by 81.155.150.254
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC0 1.0 Universal
