Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- discovery [2020/04/18 10:33]
86.174.203.193
+++ discovery [2020/08/13 12:35]
81.132.75.197
@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 **Discovery**
-Discovery services may also include
+Discovery services solutions typically depend on and may also include
   * Knowledge bases
   * Link resolvers
+See: [[https://journals.ala.org/index.php/ltr/article/view/6049/7753|Knowledge Base Evolution]] ALA TechSource Vol 52, No 6 (2016) provides a basic introduction to knowledge base terminology and functionality including link resolvers and draws on the published literature to describe the product’s evolution.
 ===== Overviews and reports =====
+[[https://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/2020/oclcresearch-library-discovery-directions-preprint.pdf|Resource Discovery for the Twenty-First Century Library]]
+Dempsey, Lorcan 2020. Foreword to Resource Discovery for the Twenty-First Century Library: Case Studies and Perspectives on the Role of IT in User Engagement and Empowerment, xxi–xxxii. Edited by Simon McLeish. London: Facet Publishing. OCLC Research Foreword Preprint. [[https://doi.org/|https://doi.org/]] 10.25333/p8j4-1411. \\
+Book citation \\
+McLeish, Simon (ed.). 2020. Resource Discovery for the Twenty-First Century Library: Case Studies and Perspectives \\
+on the Role of IT in User Engagement and Empowerment. London: Facet Publishing
+"In Conclusion \\ Discovery has been core to library operations, closely coupled with a local collection for most of its history. In a network world the relationship between discovery, collections and behaviors is changing in important ways"
 [[http://eprints.rclis.org/32499/|Library Discovery System: An integrated approach to resource discovery]] \\
@@ Line 27: / Line 38: @@
 Ken Chad keynote at the EDS (Ebsco Discovery Services) conference at Regents University, London in July 2016.
-[[https://insights.uksg.org/articles/10.1629/2048-7754.25.2.173/|E-resource Knowledge Bases and Link Resolvers]]: An Assessment of the Current Products and Emerging Trends”. Breeding, Marshall. 2012. Insights 25 (2): 173–82. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.25.2.173Insights 25 (2): 173–82. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.25.2.173
+[[https://groups.niso.org/apps/group_public/download.php/14487/future_library_resource_discovery.pdf|The Future of Library Resource Discovery]] \\
+A white paper commissioned by the NISO Discovery to Delivery (D2D) Topic Committee \\
+By Marshall Breeding February 2015
+"This paper provides an overview of the current resource discovery environment and discusses some of the possibilities regarding how these technologies, methodologies, and products might be able to adapt to changes in the evolving information landscape in scholarly communications and to take advantage of new technologies, metadata models, or linking environments to better accomplish the needs of libraries to provide access to resources".
+[[https://insights.uksg.org/articles/10.1629/2048-7754.25.2.173/|E-resource Knowledge Bases and Link Resolvers]]: An Assessment of the Current Products and Emerging Trends”. Breeding, Marshall. 2012. Insights 25 (2): 173–82. DOI: [[http://doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.25.2.173Insights|http://doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.25.2.173Insights]] 25 (2): 173–82. DOI: [[http://doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.25.2.173|http://doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.25.2.173]]
 //"This article summarizes the findings of a study on e-resource knowledge bases and OpenURL-based link resolvers sponsored by the National Library of Sweden. The project involved soliciting detailed information from each of the providers of the major products in this genre, reviewing product information available on the web and in published articles, and conducting a survey addressed to libraries using these products. The report identified and presented comparative information on a top tier of products that includes KnowledgeWorks and 360 Link from Serials Solutions; SFX Global KnowledgeBase and the SFX link resolver from Ex Libris; LinkSource and the EBSCO Integrated Knowledge Base from EBSCO and the WorldCat knowledge base from OCLC. A second tier included TOUResolver from TDNet, Gold Rush from the Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries and GODOT from Simon Fraser University".//
-[[https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1941126X.2017.1304765|Selecting link resolver and knowledge base software]]: Implications of interoperability, Cyndy Chisare, Jody Condit Fagan, David Gaines & Michael Trocchia (2017)  Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 29:2, 93-106, DOI: 10.1080/1941126X.2017.1304765
+[[https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1941126X.2017.1304765|Selecting link resolver and knowledge base software]]: Implications of interoperability, Cyndy Chisare, Jody Condit Fagan, David Gaines & Michael Trocchia (2017) Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 29:2, 93-106, DOI: 10.1080/1941126X.2017.1304765
 //"Link resolver software and their associated knowledge bases are essential technologies for modern academic libraries. Because of the increasing number of possible integrations involving link resolver software and knowledge bases, however, a library's vendor relationships, product choices, and consortial arrangements may have the most dramatic effects on the user experience and back-end maintenance workloads. A project team at a large comprehensive university recently investigated link resolver products to increase efficiency of back-end workflows while maintaining or improving the patron experience. The methodology used for product comparison may be useful for other libraries".//

helibtech

User Tools

Site Tools

Differences

Page Tools