This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
rfid [2020/06/11 06:44] admin |
rfid [2022/09/22 16:29] (current) 136.159.160.125 [Usage rates] - formatting |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
Feedback on the RFID discussion list ([[:mailto:lib-rfid-ukjiscmail.ac.uklib-rfid-ukjiscmail.ac.uk|LIB-RFID-UK@JISCMAIL.AC.UK]]) to Ken Chad from libraries (January/February 2018) on achievable self-service usage rates and nature of ‘exceptions’ | Feedback on the RFID discussion list ([[:mailto:lib-rfid-ukjiscmail.ac.uklib-rfid-ukjiscmail.ac.uk|LIB-RFID-UK@JISCMAIL.AC.UK]]) to Ken Chad from libraries (January/February 2018) on achievable self-service usage rates and nature of ‘exceptions’ | ||
- | **Library 1 (Academic)**“We average – fairly consistently over time – about 80% self-service. This is fine by us as we still offer staffed desks and a proportion of customers will always: | + | **Library 1 (Academic)** “We average – fairly consistently over time – about 80% self-service. This is fine by us as we still offer staffed desks and a proportion of customers will always: |
- | * · Prefer to transact with a human being | + | * · Prefer to transact with a human being |
* · Have a problem with their account | * · Have a problem with their account | ||
* · Are struggling with the technology (although in that case we’d usually walk them through it | * · Are struggling with the technology (although in that case we’d usually walk them through it | ||
Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
I don’t feel that people should HAVE to use it if they prefer not to. Obviously at times (for example overnight opening when there are only security-type staff available) they have to if they want to borrow/return. I’d rather offer them a choice.” | I don’t feel that people should HAVE to use it if they prefer not to. Obviously at times (for example overnight opening when there are only security-type staff available) they have to if they want to borrow/return. I’d rather offer them a choice.” | ||
- | **Library 2 (Academic)**“We average about 84% of issues and about 70% of returns via self-service.” | + | **Library 2 (Academic)** “We average about 84% of issues and about 70% of returns via self-service.” |
- | **Library 3 (Academic)**“Looking at loans and discharges since April 2017, when we went live with our new system. | + | **Library 3 (Academic)** “Looking at loans and discharges since April 2017, when we went live with our new system. |
75.6% of our total loans, which include the exceptions below. | 75.6% of our total loans, which include the exceptions below. | ||
- | * · Item-based exceptions because of items that cannot be processed through the self-issue terminals: | + | * Item-based exceptions because of items that cannot be processed through the self-issue terminals: |
- | * · Items belonging to other branches that do not have RFID capability (they are often borrowed and returned at our branch as we are open 24/7) | + | * Items belonging to other branches that do not have RFID capability (they are often borrowed and returned at our branch as we are open 24/7) |
- | * · Interlibrary loans from other libraries – even if the item has an RFID tag, we always need to do a manual checkout on these as the due date is set by the lending library not by our system circ rules | + | * Interlibrary loans from other libraries – even if the item has an RFID tag, we always need to do a manual checkout on these as the due date is set by the lending library not by our system circ rules |
- | * · CD ROMs – kept at the staff desk and not RFID tagged | + | * CD ROMs – kept at the staff desk and not RFID tagged |
- | * · Video and DVD – not RFID tagged – we only have a handful of these so it was not worth investing in the special RFID hardware. | + | * Video and DVD – not RFID tagged – we only have a handful of these so it was not worth investing in the special RFID hardware. |
- | * · Laptops – laptop loans are in the library system but are administered by our IT department who do not have RFID capability | + | * Laptops – laptop loans are in the library system but are administered by our IT department who do not have RFID capability |
- | * · Lift keys – physical keys issued to customers with mobility issues | + | * Lift keys – physical keys issued to customers with mobility issues |
- | * · Journals – not RFID tagged | + | * Journals – not RFID tagged |
User-based exceptions that tend not to be done through the self-issue terminals: | User-based exceptions that tend not to be done through the self-issue terminals: | ||
- | * · Internal housekeeping e.g. on-order, cataloguing, missing, as these don’t necessarily have a physical library card or item present perform an RFID loan | + | * Internal housekeeping e.g. on-order, cataloguing, missing, as these don’t necessarily have a physical library card or item present perform an RFID loan |
- | * · Loans to other libraries as these are done at an interlibrary loans desk at a different floor from the RFID terminals and we typically set a special due date | + | * Loans to other libraries as these are done at an interlibrary loans desk at a different floor from the RFID terminals and we typically set a special due date |
- | * · Postal loans to part time students, where the borrower (and more importantly their ID card for the kiosk) are not present” | + | * Postal loans to part time students, where the borrower (and more importantly their ID card for the kiosk) are not present” |
- | **Library 4 (academic)**“We had figures of 92% for 16/17, and 95% thus far for 17/18”. | + | **Library 4 (Academic) **“We had figures of 92% for 16/17, and 95% thus far for 17/18”. |
- | **Library 5 (Public Library)**“We have a target of 90% of all issues for our self service kiosks, and over the last 10 months of the financial year, we have been achieving just under 87%. We do have some types of transactions that are excluded from the stats for operational reasons but they are generally low volume, so I would say the 87% is representative. | + | **Library 5 (Public Library) **“We have a target of 90% of all issues for our self service kiosks, and over the last 10 months of the financial year, we have been achieving just under 87%. We do have some types of transactions that are excluded from the stats for operational reasons but they are generally low volume, so I would say the 87% is representative. |
ILLs, orchestral and playset loans would all be examples of types of transactions that would be excluded – it is usually because of the degree of staff intervention that is required to complete the loan anyway.” | ILLs, orchestral and playset loans would all be examples of types of transactions that would be excluded – it is usually because of the degree of staff intervention that is required to complete the loan anyway.” | ||
- | **Library 6 (academic)**“The library is 24/7/365 access …and we are what amounts to being a single faculty, independent university. Apart from the occasional item that needs to be issued manually in order to override the prescribed loan periods, I would guess that we have a little less than 100% RFID issues and returns as RFID self-service is the only method on offer as we have no staffed desk, one librarian and one part time assistant for a collection of 50,000 volumes..and around 250 students.” | + | **Library 6 (Academic)** “The library is 24/7/365 access …and we are what amounts to being a single faculty, independent university. Apart from the occasional item that needs to be issued manually in order to override the prescribed loan periods, I would guess that we have a little less than 100% RFID issues and returns as RFID self-service is the only method on offer as we have no staffed desk, one librarian and one part time assistant for a collection of 50,000 volumes..and around 250 students.” |
==== RFID Privacy in Libraries ==== | ==== RFID Privacy in Libraries ==== |